Does anyone think that the Canon 24-105L IS lens is a good replacement for the Canon 24-70L 2.8? - canon fast sharp lens
Both are professional L-lenses, and today I have the 24-105. My question is if I keep the fast F2.8 Lens 24-70, when the quality is better or more clear, etc. ..
Tuesday, December 8, 2009
Canon Fast Sharp Lens Does Anyone Think That The Canon 24-105L IS Lens Is A Good Replacement For The Canon 24-70L 2.8?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
This is a forum for the 'Canon SLR Lens Talk on dpreview. This specific question was asked and answered several times ... there is no clear winner. Here is a link to this son: http://forums.dpreview.com/ forums / readfl ...
Thread that binds the 3 others, and if you are still undecided, you can use the search function to be found.
I use Nikon myself. For what it's worth, is my main target your 17-55mm f / 2.8, 2.8, I used enough. Moreover, it seems that even the limited 17-55mm zoom range is about 80% of my needs.
My personal preference would be the 24-105 lens as my favorite experience. I write a lot of outdoor photography and prefer not lenses for each shot. I have the Nikon 28-80 and 35-70 and found the offer is too limiting for my needs. I think if you do a lot of work in the studio, is the 24-70, the destination of choice for this specific need.
Post a Comment